Arlington PD Testing Unmanned Aircraft If this doesn’t make you concerned over the emerging police/surveillance state…How about this: Micro Air Vehicles and Bugbots This IS a big deal. “1984” is here. On the argument: “If you are not doing anything wrong, what do you have to worry about?” What happens when the very speech you use is considered to be “extremist” by BIG GOVERNMENT? You become the target. It could happen and it is happening with the gradual move from calling people “terrorists” to “extremists”. This is deliberate. Will you be the target because of your Constitutional views, Christian beliefs, or anti-BIG GOVERNMENT stance are now considered “extreme”? I contend that this is already happening. With despots in power already, the use of our military all over the world without Congressional approval by BO, and the constant attack on traditional Judeo-Christian values, is it really too hard to imagine where this is all heading? The only solution (God willing) is to return to Constitutional Principles and adhere to the Constitution.
Here is the link from the MacIver Institute: Ten Ways the Budget Could Be Better
Concealed Carry Legislation A Victory For Tea Party, Patriot Groups
From Media Trackers: Concealed Carry Legislation A Victory For Tea Party, Patriot Groups By Collin Roth Of all the legislation passed in the last session of the Wisconsin legislature, perhaps no bill showed more the Tea Party impact on Republican legislators than the concealed carry legislation passed Tuesday in the Assembly. For a number of years, Second Amendment conservatives chafed at being one of only two states in the country that do not have some form of concealed carry. And despite two vetoes by Democratic Governor Jim Doyle, a tumultuous legislative session primarily focused on the budget, and the threat of recall elections for six state senators, Tea Party conservatives kept the pressure on to bring concealed carry legislation to a vote in this session. Annette Olson of the pro-2nd Amendment organization Un-infringed Liberty called the passage of concealed carry legislation yesterday a “huge step.” Olson said her organization allied with Tea Party groups from around the state to work with legislators in order to bring concealed carry legislation to a vote before the end of this legislative session. And while Olson and many Tea Party activists were disappointed when the Constitutional Carry Bill proposed by Senator Pam Galloway was…
The Rock River Patriots will be having a meeting this Friday June 24th in Fort Atkinson at 6pm. The meeting will be held in the community room at the Dwight Foster Library 209 Merchants Avenue in Fort Atkinson. At this meeting we will discuss current news, upcoming events, and other important issues. Hope to see you all there!
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51iAilbjy8o&feature=share]
This clip proves Bill O’Reilly doesn’t have a clue about economics. We already know he doesn’t understand the Constitution. [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A17lR53YeSg]
The following video contains graphic language. This is one example of the radical left at work. Yesterday, Sen. Glen Grothman had an air-horn blown into his ear by one of the protestors around the Capitol wearing a Madison Teacher’s Union Shirt. In our view this is probably could be a felony assault… Permanent hearing loss could result from something like this. This could be classified as Substantial Battery or Aggravated Battery. Here are the State Statutes regarding these two crimes: 940.19(2) – Whoever causes substantial bodily harm to another by an act done with intent to cause bodily harm to that person or another is guilty of a Class I felony. “Substantial bodily harm” means bodily injury that causes a laceration that requires stitches; any fracture of a bone; a burn; a temporary loss of consciousness, sight or hearing; a concussion; or a loss or fracture of a tooth. 940.19(4) – Whoever causes great bodily harm to another by an act done with intent to cause bodily harm to that person or another is guilty of a Class H felony. “Great bodily harm” means bodily injury which creates a substantial risk of death, or which causes serious permanent disfigurement, or…
The Budget Repair Bill and Concealed Carry
The Wisconsin Supreme Court overturned Judge Sumi’s ruling on the collective bargaining law. Dane County Liberal Activist Judge Maryann Sumi Usurped The Power Of The Legislature Say Justices The Wisconsin State Senate passed SB-93 – Concealed Carry in a 25-8 vote. While it is not Constitutional Carry like we want, it is a step in the right direction. Thank your Senator if he/she voted in favor of this bill. Tell them we will continue to push for Constitutional Carry, but appreciate the big step forward that they took. Our focus now moves to the Assembly. Contact your Assembly representatives and tell them to pass SB-93 as is with no further restrictions on your natural right to keep and bear arms. This bill is already a significant compromise from Constitutional Carry.
John Stossel Looks Inside Wisconsin’s Budget Debate
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0NWiYt8Ls4&feature=share]
Tomorrow, the Wisconsin State Senate will be debating SB-93 and the 16 Amendments to this bill. The proposed Amendments are MORE restrictions to a Constitutional Right. We support Constitutional Carry because the right to keep and bear arms is a natural right. We will continue to support and fight for Constitutional Carry. We also knew this permit process is a slippery slope to more regulation. RINO Senator Van Wanggaard is one of those proposing more restrictions on our right to keep and bear arms. Remember this when he is up for re-election. This is further proof that just because the person is “Republican” does not mean they believe in fidelity to the Constitution. Contact the Republican Senators and tell them not to further infringe on your natural rights. Here is the NRA criticisms of these amendments and responding to the misinformation: PPA NRA Position on Hostile Amendments PPA Opponent Misinformation