New American Article On Paul Nehlen, Challenger to Speaker Paul Ryan

Below is an article on Paul Nehlen written by the New American Magazine, a publication of the John Birch Society, that is worth your reading.

Standing on Constitution, Businessman Aims to Depose Paul Ryan

If you have been paying attention, many in the so-called “conservative” media have come out against Paul Nehlen, trying to take him down.  We have consistently said that the Rock River Patriots do not endorse candidates, but we will call candidates out when they don’t live up to their promises. Isn’t it funny how many of these “conservative” voices, who claim to be independent and non-establishment, are once again acting as lap dogs and doing the bidding of the big government Republicans?  They tout Paul Ryan’s conservative credentials, yet fail to mention he supported TARP, the bank bailouts, the Patriot  Act, and budgets that are anything but fiscally responsible.  Paul Ryan is credited as being this “budget architect” proposing budget plans that “really cut spending” over a 10 – 20 year window.  Paul Ryan is laughing at his naive supporters, knowing full well that future Congresses will not be held to his budget proposals.

Just remember…Don’t trust something at face value just because you hear it from “conservative” media.  Everyone has an agenda.  The RRP have been very clear about our agenda, and it can be seen here.

Is It Too Late?

Below is the article by the John Birch Society which was discussed at our last meeting in addition to the support your local police campaign.

Is It Too Late

Is It Too Late p2

Is It Too Late p3

Is It Too Late p4

 

 

 

Rock River Patriots Meeting Friday December 11th

The Rock River Patriots will be having a meeting this Friday December 11th in Fort Atkinson at the Dwight Foster Library at 6:00pm.  The Dwight Foster Library is located at 209 Merchants Avenue.

At this meeting, we welcome Mark Griffin, Field Coordinator for the John Birch Society who will be giving a presentation about their Support Your Local Police campaign.

After the presentation, we will celebrate Christmas with a time of food and fellowship and discuss plans for the upcoming year.

Hope to see you all there!

Why Are Republicans Calling To Disarm The American People?

Why Are Republicans Calling To Disarm The American People?

The above linked article does a good job to demonstrate why “the price of liberty is eternal vigilance”.  We have spoken out repeatedly against the NEOCONs because they truly do not represent the Constitution as they claim.

One of the people listed in the linked story is Bill Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard, a neocon magazine.  John McManus of the John Birch Society has done a great job in a presentation explaining the NEOCONSERVATIVE AGENDA.  Bill Kristol’s father, Irving Kristol, wrote a book about the Neoconservative Agenda and was a former Trotskyite.  Followers of Leon Trotsky, called Trotskyites, were followers of a form of Marxist theory.  Trotsky considered himself an orthodox Marxist and a Bolshevik-Leninist.  Watch the video, and see for yourself.  We can conclude from Kristol’s comments that the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.

Also contained in the above link is the PINHEAD Bill O’Reilly, proving once again he is no friend of liberty.  We have the video below for you to view.  O’Reilly’s analysis is full of factual inaccuracies and will not even allow the congressman time to explain anything.  O’reilly is deliberately misleading his viewers calling for regulation of “heavy weapons” and “machine guns”.  They are ALREADY regulated by the BATF, requiring a background check, 6 month wait, and tax-stamp.  AK-47’s and AR-15’s sold at gun shows are NOT machine guns.  A machine gun is defined as a rifle that has the ability to fire fully automatic, meaning one trigger pull results in the gun firing multiple rounds.  The guns sold are semi-automatic rifles meaning one round is fired with each trigger pull.  These guns have the same size bullets that are used in hunting rifles.  They are NOT “heavy weaponry” as O’reilly would have you believe.

Guns are not the problem, but rather the lack of guns.  No amount of government oversight can prevent a tragedy that is perpetrated by someone who is on a “homicidal mission”.  The theater in Aurora Colorado was posted as a “No Carry” location.  This just proves that gun control and gun-free zones are successful…if you are a nut, bent on going on a massive killing spree.

Maybe the Aurora Colorado shooter could have been stopped by an armed citizen.  Maybe not.  The fact remains that we will never know.  What does remain, however, is that by taking away a person’s ability to defend themselves, you are emboldening the potential assailant.  What might have been the deciding factor in deterring a “would-be shooter” for fear of armed resistance, is longer a threat to them when entering a “gun free zone” or a “no carry” location.  It should give any “would-be shooter” pause, knowing there is the potential that someone may be shooting back.  Yes…There are those “shooters” who have no fear of armed resistance.    For those who are determined to carry out their homicidal intentions, it is why we advocate armed citizens to obtain quality firearms training and carry whenever possible.

In closing, here are a few quotes from our founding fathers about the importance of armed citizens:

No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms. (Thomas Jefferson: Draft Virginia Constitution, 1776.)

Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence … From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to insure peace, security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable . . . the very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that is good.  (George Washington)

Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? (Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836)

Overview of America by JBS

An Expose on The NeoConservative Agenda